Some important articles used for visual aides in the podcast for reference;
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
You might want to have a look at the discussion I had with Mark Conlon, 9/11 Planes Research - who Jerm also had on, discussing the current plane disinformation being peddled by the so called 9/11 "truth" movement.
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
Getting The 9/11 Truther Plane Propaganda In Focus
I am glad you found it educational on how the truth of 9/11 has been obscured by the 9/11 “truth” movement’s talking heads…
I highly recommend Prof David A, Hughes' writing on 9/11 as well.
This is an excellent presentation he did, also pointing out the problems with the thermite and nuke theories... (see his substack tab on 9/11 for more info)
Prof David A. Hughes – An 1h Presentation of irrefutable 9/11 evidence in 2024
There are three key layers to perception management:
(i) the official narrative,
(ii) the official approved alternative narrative, and
Yes, I'm among Prof David A. Hughes' early Substack subscribers, and find his articles, books, and interviews very helpful. Looking forward to seeing Jerm's upcoming interview with him.
I noticed your very gracious close to this presentation: "I don't really need followers -- I don't want followers -- I just want people to go look at Dr. Wood's book [Where did the Towers Go?"], and Andrew Johnson's two books ["911 Holding the Truth" and "911 Finding the Truth"] and they can then make up their own minds..."
Sounds like one of the benefits of being interviewed by Jerm, was the opportunity to see the Hughes interview before released. Do you know when he plans to post it?
Just my bit on the subject, however the ONLY thing necessary to force the conclusion that 9/11/2001 was a total fraud: being the fact that all 4 alleged airliner crashes would have required violations of the laws of physics in order to have been as reported. This is a HUGE glaring issue. There were NO airliners. 9/11/2001 was a LIE - - - "HomeLandSecurity" is based upon FRAUD.
The only thing that really matters is that this was a false flag. Let's start rounding up the perpetrators and get the details on how they did it when we're waterboarding them.
You comment indicates you didn't even listen to the interview - tsk, tsk, tsk...
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
I'm sorry, I just haven't had time to watch the whole thing yet. But I will. And none of the theories or concepts you mention are foreign to me. I understand the lengths these psychopaths will go to keep us all down. I appreciate your work to expose the truth.
Thank you for having me on...
Some important articles used for visual aides in the podcast for reference;
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings
The 9/11 Building 7 HOAX
Building 7 did NOT go down to fire or explosives.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-building-7-hoax-video-of-2011
The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories
People are so easily led by perceived "experts".
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Revisiting the various 9/11 Plane Narratives
The most important thought experiment to date
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/revisiting-the-911-cgi-plane-narrative
September 11, 2001 - An Essential Guide (2024)
Sept 11, 2001 has been and still is a 23 year long PSYOP.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/september-11-2001-an-essential-guide
Excellent interview and I’m very glad to have found 9/11 Revisionist !
You might want to have a look at the discussion I had with Mark Conlon, 9/11 Planes Research - who Jerm also had on, discussing the current plane disinformation being peddled by the so called 9/11 "truth" movement.
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
Getting The 9/11 Truther Plane Propaganda In Focus
Podcast: https://rumble.com/v6q6eo8-when-the-911-truther-plane-narratives-do-not-fly.html
Thank you for this 🙏🏻 I will watch tomorrow. It all adds grist to the mill to wake people up to the lies they’ve been told - from all sides!
Plasma
Awesome extended presentation here! Thanks to both of you.
I am glad you found it educational on how the truth of 9/11 has been obscured by the 9/11 “truth” movement’s talking heads…
I highly recommend Prof David A, Hughes' writing on 9/11 as well.
This is an excellent presentation he did, also pointing out the problems with the thermite and nuke theories... (see his substack tab on 9/11 for more info)
Prof David A. Hughes – An 1h Presentation of irrefutable 9/11 evidence in 2024
There are three key layers to perception management:
(i) the official narrative,
(ii) the official approved alternative narrative, and
(iii) the truth.
Presentation: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood
Also look into the "planes" with Mark Conlon - 9/11 Planes Research
His substack: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/
Yes, I'm among Prof David A. Hughes' early Substack subscribers, and find his articles, books, and interviews very helpful. Looking forward to seeing Jerm's upcoming interview with him.
I noticed your very gracious close to this presentation: "I don't really need followers -- I don't want followers -- I just want people to go look at Dr. Wood's book [Where did the Towers Go?"], and Andrew Johnson's two books ["911 Holding the Truth" and "911 Finding the Truth"] and they can then make up their own minds..."
Yes, more awakenings please.
Jerm’s podcast with Prof Hughes was very good and they also ended up touching on 9/11 - You’ll really enjoy it once it comes out..
Sounds like one of the benefits of being interviewed by Jerm, was the opportunity to see the Hughes interview before released. Do you know when he plans to post it?
Yes, it's a benefit to be a monthly subscriber to Jerm's community, because you can watch the interview as it' being recorded.
BUT I've been following Prof Hughes for some time now and the interview was stellar.
I signed up via Substack. Looks like I should have signed up on his website to see info about attending live interviews.
Send email an email and I will sort you out. Can't have you missing out on the cool stuff!
I too subscribe to Jerm and Hughes, but was not aware I can watch Jerm live. Thanks for the info!
Just my bit on the subject, however the ONLY thing necessary to force the conclusion that 9/11/2001 was a total fraud: being the fact that all 4 alleged airliner crashes would have required violations of the laws of physics in order to have been as reported. This is a HUGE glaring issue. There were NO airliners. 9/11/2001 was a LIE - - - "HomeLandSecurity" is based upon FRAUD.
The only thing that really matters is that this was a false flag. Let's start rounding up the perpetrators and get the details on how they did it when we're waterboarding them.
You comment indicates you didn't even listen to the interview - tsk, tsk, tsk...
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Your three issues are so valid for engaging truth.
I'm sorry, I just haven't had time to watch the whole thing yet. But I will. And none of the theories or concepts you mention are foreign to me. I understand the lengths these psychopaths will go to keep us all down. I appreciate your work to expose the truth.