33 Comments
User's avatar
Craig's avatar

Gore Vidal said "There is only one party in the United States, the Property Party … and it has two right wings: Republican and Democrat." This makes sense to me. The United States is not nor has it ever been a democracy. It has always been a plutocracy with a thin illusion of caring about the 99%.

Expand full comment
60Gigahertz2's avatar

Remember George Carlin's rip that ends with "The OWN YOU"? That one absolutely nailed it.

Expand full comment
Roc Findlay's avatar

South African Rugby team; Left Wing (No. 11): Kurt-Lee Arendse is on the left wing.

Right Wing (No. 14): Cheslin Kolbe plays on the right wing.

All the political nutters got totally confused when they swapped jersies.

Expand full comment
The Bodysnatchers's avatar

The best way to control people is to divide them down some assumed 'middle' and they will naturally fight with each other. That's why feminism has been so wildly successful (for them). It's easy to see who your 'enemy' is - you don't even need to talk to them! In terms of the destruction of social cohesion and reproduction, it's been way more successful than left-right politics.

Expand full comment
60Gigahertz2's avatar

That is true. But where I live, the political scene is incredibly entrenched. The Repugs still attempt to separate the women out of the room, before they get down to business at the local GOP (Grand Old Party) meetings. I would not have believed that this happened if it hadn't happened to one of my relatives.

The Repugs are a mess and the Demons are a mess and it all adds up to what you describe: Divide and Conquer but with the twist that somehow, every key decision either side makes has the exact same result.

Plus our elected congresscritters are paid off by AIPAC/zionists. 324 US congressmembers have AIPAC handlers that make sure they do what the zionists want. So we don't have a people's congress. All we have is a mini-Knesset, and I think it's been that way for decades.

Expand full comment
The Bodysnatchers's avatar

If the congress critters vote to release the Epstein files tomorrow, look out below!

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

Never gonna happen as congress is only interested in preserving its corruption, theft and grifting ways. El Trumpo is the enemy of the leftists and RINOS.

Expand full comment
60Gigahertz2's avatar

These fuckers better do it. Our president is a worthless pedo.

Expand full comment
Mediocrates's avatar

Being an Australian I find the spectacle of the US political party electioneering conventions to be an extraordinary bacchanalian display of glitter, glitz and glamour devoid of any sense of mature adult behaviour. Wearing either blue or red, with ribbons, sashes, straw boater hats, logo-ed base ball caps, placards most with the same epithets, chanting and cheering to scripted celebrity performances says nothing politically substantive to me. It is idol worship.

Expand full comment
Diane's avatar

I’m also an Australian of mature years and am constantly surprised by the way US politics is conducted. It just looks like garish theatre to me.

Not that I think most of our lot are any better. It’s embarrassing, juvenile and sickening at times.

Expand full comment
Rick  Batross's avatar

T Y jerm for your thoughts on positioning. I also am of the MIDDLE FINGER WAY,and i call em as i see em. There must be millions of us,not brain washed,unpropagandized and thus free thinking. I may 'see' all a bit differently than you,but darkness separates people and light brings us closer. I refuse to use separation wording and remain considering all of us Americans.

Expand full comment
Bard Joseph's avatar

" The Freemasons should control all men of every class, nation and religion, dominating them without obvious compulsion; uniting them through a strong bond; inspiring them with enthusiasm to spread common ideas; and with utmost secrecy and energy, direct them toward this singular objective throughout the world."

Adam Weishaupt, Munich 1765.

Expand full comment
60Gigahertz2's avatar

And they are a global presence at the local level. I have always wondered if the Freemasons control The Shriners, The Knights of Columbus, and the other orders out there. And what influence do they have on the Roundtable groups? I would like to know for reference how all of these groups are guided. Do they all report to the WEF, which then reports to the BIS?

Expand full comment
Bard Joseph's avatar

All originate with the Bank of England since its creation with William of Orange.

Expand full comment
60Gigahertz2's avatar

I haven't found this book: The Hidden Hand: Unraveling the Rothschilds and Israel by Michael McKibben and Douglas Gabriel, but in this interview, he has traced the "jewish" bankers back to ancient Babylon on the Silk Road. He says these people created the financial centers along the Silk Road.

YT CHANNEL: American Intelligence Media (Suppressed)

The Hidden Hand: Unraveling the Rothschilds and Israel- Douglas Gabriel & Michael McKibben

https://www.bitchute.com/video/xE8dolmiAj5a

The Hidden Hand: Unraveling the Rothschilds and Israel Douglas Gabriel & Michael McKibben American Intelligence Media https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avQUUSc7Tco

************************

The Rādhānites are an ancient merchant-banker group that controlled the banking and commerce of the Silk Road trade of the Babylonian Empire among China, Europe, and North Africa, extending all the way to Iceland.

Ibn Khordadbeh, Arab historian, postmaster, and secret policeman in Baghdad (formerly Babylon), identified them his Book of Roads and Kingdoms ca. 870 AD. This article explores these claims, examining their role in creating British Zionism, fueling the antisemitism trope, and controlling modern Israel.

Expand full comment
Bard Joseph's avatar

This book is interesting.

"Now time grows short. History will not allow the people of Shem additional centuries, or even decades, to come to their senses and realize what is going on. Just as they have been victims of massacres and genocides for centuries, the people of Shem now face the determination of the Canaanites to exterminate them utterly and finally. a goal they hope to achieve by the end of the millenium." The Curse of Canaan.... Eustace Mullins 1987

Expand full comment
60Gigahertz2's avatar

Eustace Mullins! I have his book on the Federal Reserve. It's incredible how many people in the 1900 to 1980 were absolutely prescient in their understanding of what was coming.

Expand full comment
Malmo's avatar

Much of your old content, I cannot find anywhere. You had a discussion with Mark McDonald about polygamy which was excellent yet it seems to have vanished. Would really like to see that again if possible.

Expand full comment
Anton Van Deventer's avatar

Do not agree. In the New Testament JESUS is at one place described as “ on the right side” because he did challenge the Pharisees.

Expand full comment
Tracy Kolenchuk's avatar

Re:" here’s how I define them.

- Left-wing means how things should be.

- Right-wing means how things are."

It's an interesting view, but it misses an important fact.

- left simply means "they" when spoken by people who perceive themselves as on the right.

- right simply means "they" when spoken by people who perceive themselves as on the left.

The main purpose of the left/right distinction is to seperate us into friends and not-friends and enemies and not enemies.

Far right? That simply means either

- "those of them on the right that I really really hate.

- never "those of them on the right that I can really really trust."

That Is to say, that only someone who perceives themselves as "not on the right (or left)" can use the "far" modifier for left or right.

Re "how things are... VS how things should be"

I think it's more accurate to say that people on the right focus their attention on the good things they perceive, while those on the left focus on the bad things they perceive. Thus, "far" can be used by either side when they perceive that the others perceptions of good and bad differ significantly.

Language is fun. Yes, I agree we need to define left and right if we want to discuss positions and concepts in a cooperative understanding manner. But if we just want to win, clarity is not a good idea. Competitors are more likely to win by intentional or unintended deceit.

Expand full comment
Seeds's avatar

There is a divide - a moral one.

Moral, responsible people cannot stand with immoral, irresponsible people.

Win or lose, immoral people will always undermine the welfare of all.

An enduring house cannot be built on a faulty moral foundation.

The foundations will crack.

The supporting columns will crumble, the walls collapse and the roof fall.

Thus it was, is now, and always will be.

Unless the script of history changes.

Not likely.

Expand full comment
waypasthadenough's avatar

Many to most suffer from the sincerity of ignorance. If millions to billions believe a falsehood to the point they're willing to kill you over it then it's very real.

The right vs left paradigm, construct. is mentioned in the ancient tribal propaganda. It likely goes back into prehistory.

https://www.openbible.info/topics/the_right_hand_and_the_left

Historically if they're claiming 'non-partisanship' they're likely commies or they have an incomplete understanding of their situation.

https://www.euronews.com/2025/11/16/gen-zs-take-to-the-streets-in-mexico-20-arrested-and-over-100-police-officers-injured

That ol' time religion ain't what it used to be and never is. Same for that ol' time politics. The republicrat and demonscat parties aren't what they were in the mid 19th centuries despite all the morons who point out the democrats were the party of slavery while the republicans were the original party of big govt. and the 'radicals' of reconstruction.

No one in my govt. school and university career ever defined what a 'liberal' or a 'conservative' really was. The msnm newswhores used to claim that 'conservatives' only wanted 'change' a little more slowly than the 'liberals'(commie trash).

None of them told us what a 'classical liberal' was. That was their biggest lie. It was all the stuff they leave out and often still is.

The tool using monkeys excel at finding shit to argue over and at murdering each others kids in the name of the latest insanity, or the oldest. See Gaza.

They don't need a devil or a sadistic bronze age god to do that. Those are just the excuses.

See this as well and my comments under 'waypasthadenogh':

What is the Deep State? - Questions For Corbett

https://www.bitchute.com/video/_vsnefzkBng

FreeKentucky.com

Expand full comment
Iain McCausland's avatar

Boycott the system through peaceful revolution:https://x.com/darksidemedia_/status/1988060205436047751?s=46

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

The US is now more commie than China. Any system that tries to control human freedom is communist or socialist. Government, run by the deep state is the enemy...all governments are fashioned in this manner. Try speaking out against their tyranny. Is this allowed in China? I don't think so and the US is going the same route. Thought control and total life choice control is the desire of the deep state. Government seems to be fully riding the bandwagon of depopulation. Thus your only life choice will be death by murder.

Expand full comment
Seeds's avatar

"Any system that tries to control human freedom is communist or socialist."

Or fascism.

We have a police FORCE - a number of them now.

We have military FORCES - more than three of them.

We have a WORKFORCE.

Economic FORCES.

Yet a DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT!

Yeah right - or left - WHATEVER!

Expand full comment
LoWa's avatar

India was ruled by the East India Company for a time, and had no state of any substance beyond the dictates of the Company. EIC monopolised trade, shifted production to UK, imposed steep tariffs on Indian exports to UK and retained low or no tariffs on UK goods going to India, imposed a 50% tax which caused farmers to flee their lands, caused hunger and poverty through its economic policies…

Would you call this communist too? There was no real state to speak of really, it was the Corporation running the show.

Expand full comment
Iain McCausland's avatar

Left or Right? 2 cheeks of the same backside.

Expand full comment
Rod Norman's avatar

Thank you Jeremy - I so needed this.

Expand full comment
Jerm's avatar

My pleasure! Why not become a paid subscriber since I’m doing a bunch of these. 🤣

Expand full comment