People like to believe victims don’t become perpetrators. This new trend is really sad because we live in a world full of perpetrators who have sold people the idea they are victims.
If Michael wasn’t fiddling kids he would have invited the parents to stay over too. He would have included cameras instead of excluding them from the one place he said the parents who sacrificed their children to him could never go.
It’s brutally debilitating to real victims to tell them crap like this and let them believe they weren’t as innocent and good as Michael was when Michael is the perp.
This is why the world is evil and all people do is bitch about it. What’s the point when the smoothest criminal always wins?
Michael didn’t fiddle any kids. Parents did stay over. His bedroom was the size of an entire double storey house. Why would parents send their kids to stay over at a child fiddler? Sick parents.
Really sick take, mate.
Also, where is your evidence for any of your claims? Oh, wait. Mainstream media. 👍
I’m claiming those things are fabricated, yes. I’m claiming you’re believing nonsense fed to you. I’m claiming you’re a sheep. You don’t even know the details. You’re just parroting CNN.
You didn’t answer my question: why would parents send their kids to a child fiddler?
I’m exposing the truth and you think I’m worshipping him. 🤣 Ideology messes up your mind.
I especially like how you’re defending parents willingly sending their kids to a molester. You even give it a medical name to make it seem more acceptable.
Sick take. Also, George Carlin would laugh at you. He actually joked about something similar.
Which is why it isn’t true. He didn’t fiddle kids and the parents knew this. Some of them stayed over too.
🤣 You’ve said it yourself - MJ was a ‘molestor.’ 💯 he would be classed as a ‘Preferential Child Molestor.’ Ever since Hayvenhurst, one boy after another, he’d been doing it for decades, getting away with it for decades & with the help of his complicit enablers - Covered up for decades - right up to today!
The full extent is still not known as there are many dozens not just in US, but also incidents abroad, who’ve been kept silent with hush-money payments & NDA’s. MJ was a wolf in sheep’s clothing, pulled the wool over everyone's eyes, groomed the world, fooled us all & got away with it - all in plain sight!!! He played us all!!!
If you’d skipped over that period of life called childhood as Michael clearly did, you’d likely be hanging out with kids too….. He loved the purity, simplicity, and joy of children as many of us who worked with children do also. And they adored the absolute genius that he was… maybe have a few of your own so you’ll understand the attraction…And get your information straight.. you listen to mainstream media too much maybe. His mistake was that he had a medical doctor “caring” for him.
I find it really sad that some people WANT to believe that MJ was guilty. It is as though they WANT children to have been abused. A bit of a twisted stance in my view. There is SO MUCH evidence to the contrary, that those who choose to ignore it, are beyond indolent.
Consider the Cascio family: they benefitted financially from their friendship with MJ while he was alive and they have upped the ante since his death. In 2011, Frank Cascio wrote a book: My Friend Michael: An Ordinary Friendship with an Extraordinary Man. He made a fortune. The family then sold MJ's soiled underwear. Eddie Cascio and his songwriting partner, James Porte, faked songs using an MJ impersonator called Jason Malachi. These songs, which came to be known as the 'Cascio tracks', appreared on the posthumous album 'Michael'. It was only due to forensic research by MJ fans and REAL journalists, that this audacious fraud was exposed. The tracks were eventually removed from streaming platforms and subsequent versions of the album. See this brilliant podcast series for a breakdown of this shameful grift: https://www.fakingmichael.com/
It seems the Cascios have now run out of money, so they are attempting to extort the MJ Estate AGAIN by claiming that they were all abused. Are they really credible? Their accusations are risible and do not hold up to scrutiny. REAL victms are actually put at a disavantage when fake accusers make false claims.
Charles Thomson, an award-winning REAL journaiist, (who actually exposed a UK paedophile ring in Shoebury, Essex) wrote this article highlighting the disgraceful behaviour of the MSM during the MJ trial: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/one-of-the-most-shameful_b_610258
I don't expect you to read or listen to any of the above. But if you decide to ignore it, are you really in a position to pass judgement?
Are you implying MJs testimony, the videos of the ranch, the layout, and explanation he personally made were pretend, or AI, or forced somehow? Is that your theory?
And this new idea you’re dropping that anyone who is worried about pedophilia is secretly wanting abuse while the people who claim it never happens are secretly child rescuers? Do you read your own thoughts?
You seem to think if there’s bogus claims anywhere he must be innocent. But this is the same defense Trump and Epstein deploy. And now you.
MJ was a victim who treated children like they were equals. I get you don’t understand that’s pedophilia. I get you think mimicking consent for a child is okay on your book as long as you are Michael Jackson.
I get you guys are as lost as they come because the world wasn’t able to give you discernment yet. All you can do is blame someone like me who was interested in the case long before the post Covid recycled truth stories runs its retakes.
Your comment leans heavily on emotional framing and assumption rather than actual facts.
MJ's testimony supports innocence, not guilt. The ranch was an open, communal space visited by hundreds of families, celebrities, and children with their parents present.
'Mimicking consent with a child is okay as long as you're Michael Jackson'
This is a straw man. Our argument is that there's no evidence he did anything sexual with children. You're making the claim and you're providing flimsy evidence.
Robson told police nothing happened when he was 10 (1993), then testified again as an adult during the 2005 trial that MJ never behaved inappropriately. Only when MJ could no longer defend himself, after his death, did the story change; he filed a civil case, wanting millions. You're defending fraudulent behaviour.
Plus, Safechuck himself had testified as a character witness defending MJ. He didn't claim abuse until 2014 (after MJ's death, when he couldn't defend himself) — 25 years after the alleged events.
Jordan Chandler initially denied anything happened — until after his father administered sodium amytal (a sedative associated with false memory syndrome) during a dental procedure he oversaw. So, his father drugged him so that he could change his story. The investigation found no evidence against MJ. In 2006, Jordan took out a restraining order against his own father. 🤣
There are no sides to history. Only ignorant people desperate for attention claiming there were. You have a binary idea that a victim cant be a perp or a perp cant be a victim too. This is the last time i will represent you with my case. You have yet to address any of these things and i can see why you are so desperate to disparage m so I give you the last word.
Deep breath Jerm. You can read these points and process them if you relax:
1) Are you implying MJs testimony, the videos of the ranch, the layout, and explanation he personally made were pretend, or AI, or forced somehow? Is that your theory?
2) This new idea you’re dropping that anyone who is worried about pedophilia is secretly wanting abuse while the people who claim it never happens are secretly child rescuers? Do you read your own thoughts?
3) You seem to think if there’s bogus claims anywhere he must be innocent. But this is the same defense Trump and Epstein deploy. And now you.
4) MJ was a victim who treated children like they were equals. I get you don’t understand that’s pedophilia. I get you think mimicking consent for a child is okay on your book as long as you are Michael Jackson.
'There are no sides to history. Only ignorant people desperate for attention claiming there were. '
Of course there are sides to history. For example, the true side and the fabricated side.
'You have a binary idea that a victim cant be a perp or a perp cant be a victim too.'
False. I have the binary idea that your claims are bunk. For your claims to be true, you need evidence. You have failed to provide such evidence.
Your questions are disingenuous and set up as logical fallacies to lean into your narrative. Plus, I've already answered them and will copy and paste my answers:
---
Your comment leans heavily on emotional framing and assumption rather than actual facts.
MJ's testimony supports innocence, not guilt. The ranch was an open, communal space visited by hundreds of families, celebrities, and children with their parents present.
'Mimicking consent with a child is okay as long as you're Michael Jackson'
This is a straw man. Our argument is that there's no evidence he did anything sexual with children. You're making the claim and you're providing flimsy evidence.
Robson told police nothing happened when he was 10 (1993), then testified again as an adult during the 2005 trial that MJ never behaved inappropriately. Only when MJ could no longer defend himself, after his death, did the story change; he filed a civil case, wanting millions. You're defending fraudulent behaviour.
Plus, Safechuck himself had testified as a character witness defending MJ. He didn't claim abuse until 2014 (after MJ's death, when he couldn't defend himself) — 25 years after the alleged events.
Jordan Chandler initially denied anything happened — until after his father administered sodium amytal (a sedative associated with false memory syndrome) during a dental procedure he oversaw. So, his father drugged him so that he could change his story. The investigation found no evidence against MJ. In 2006, Jordan took out a restraining order against his own father.
---
If you persist with your flimsy arguments lacking in evidence, then I would prefer you honour your threat of this being 'the last time i will represent you with my case.' Because you're wasting my time.
If you have an actual argument with actual evidence, then bring it. Otherwise, I'm not interested in your shallow nonsense.
I am sorry you have resorted to ad hominem attack. You will note that I did not address you personally. Also, straw man arguments won't wash either. I have provided you with links. If you have discernment yourself, you will spend the next couple of days listening and reading. Finding the truth takes commitment. If you choose not to do this, I cannot help you.
The saying is that we recognize qualities of others that are in ourselves. If you see evil, you have the same evil tendancy. Some of us choose to see the beauty and innocence. Who’s sick now?
Did you actually listen to the interview? It would seem that you didn’t.
As for your opening shot - victims DO NOT always become perpetrators. I was the victim of a violent mother. Do you want to know how often I have ever hit a child? ZERO TIMES MATE.
Swan off to your own indecipherable channel. James. You are not a rational judge.
I have looked at these articles in the past. Who authored them? I cannot see a name. Whoever it is, they have gone to a great deal of trouble. Why? They allude to the ‘victims’ who have been discredited.
“Wade says that he was molested by Michael from age 7 until age 14 (1990-1997). We were able to prove that Wade has spent 176 nights with Jackson. No one knows what Michael did to young Wade during those nights.”
The idea that MJ was some Machiavellian mastermind who manipulated everyone in his orbit, is ridiculous. Listen to Wade’s mother destroy Wade’s timeline: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnjtrYjMbc8
Funny how MJ obsessed stans fans can't face the truth about MJ the man & pretend to play deaf, dumb & blind when the information is staring them in the face!!!
I still beg to differ regarding the Santa Marta (favela) version of TDCAU! It is not merely a 'happy clappy' version, as I explained in my UKC posts. But we will have to agree to disagree. It certainly isn't a frivolous subject, and all roads do indeed lead to Jeffery Epstein.
I really like Michael Jackson, so I do some analysis on his music I really like Michael Jackson too I do some analysis on his music could you mention me so that I can gain a little bit in visibility ? It will help me a lot. Thanks in advance
MJ was a wolf in sheep's clothing, who pulled the wool over everyone's eyes, fooled the world & got away with it, all in plain sight! It's a valuable lesson to parents with young children - to beware of charming, creepy older men! We liked his music - but should never have let him 'babysit' our children!!!
Why do people keep parroting the same nonsense? It's like you're a bot. Without fail, the same 'search MJ and boys' comment comes up, as if it's a gotcha. It isn't. Anything with Bashir is propaganda. He was a proven liar.
There is no evidence that MJ fiddled with kids. Even the kids said he didn't. And besides, if he was so dodgy, why did parents take their kids to Neverland for more than a decade? And why did the kid, who made the allegations, refuse to testify against MJ, and why did the same kid get a restraining order against his own father?
You’re parroting propaganda and it reveals more about what’s in your own heart, than that of Michael. He was a musical genius and a dancer extraordinaire. Perhaps it’s jealousy that is fueling this vicious attack on his legacy. His mistake was having anything to do with medical doctors and their poisonous “solutions”.
Sadly he was'nt the only muscician who had to pay by death in that satanic industry in the US!!!
People like to believe victims don’t become perpetrators. This new trend is really sad because we live in a world full of perpetrators who have sold people the idea they are victims.
If Michael wasn’t fiddling kids he would have invited the parents to stay over too. He would have included cameras instead of excluding them from the one place he said the parents who sacrificed their children to him could never go.
It’s brutally debilitating to real victims to tell them crap like this and let them believe they weren’t as innocent and good as Michael was when Michael is the perp.
This is why the world is evil and all people do is bitch about it. What’s the point when the smoothest criminal always wins?
Really sick take, mate.
Michael didn’t fiddle any kids. Parents did stay over. His bedroom was the size of an entire double storey house. Why would parents send their kids to stay over at a child fiddler? Sick parents.
Really sick take, mate.
Also, where is your evidence for any of your claims? Oh, wait. Mainstream media. 👍
Court transcripts.
Civil court litigation records.
Massive settlements.
Victim statements.
You are claiming these things are “mainstream media”
You are worshipping a perpetrator to get attention, that’s a sick take you have.
I’m claiming those things are fabricated, yes. I’m claiming you’re believing nonsense fed to you. I’m claiming you’re a sheep. You don’t even know the details. You’re just parroting CNN.
You didn’t answer my question: why would parents send their kids to a child fiddler?
I’m exposing the truth and you think I’m worshipping him. 🤣 Ideology messes up your mind.
Do you not know why parents do this?
You wrote this article without once considering how epigenetic trauma works?
Not once?
I especially like how you’re defending parents willingly sending their kids to a molester. You even give it a medical name to make it seem more acceptable.
Sick take. Also, George Carlin would laugh at you. He actually joked about something similar.
Which is why it isn’t true. He didn’t fiddle kids and the parents knew this. Some of them stayed over too.
🤣 You’ve said it yourself - MJ was a ‘molestor.’ 💯 he would be classed as a ‘Preferential Child Molestor.’ Ever since Hayvenhurst, one boy after another, he’d been doing it for decades, getting away with it for decades & with the help of his complicit enablers - Covered up for decades - right up to today!
The full extent is still not known as there are many dozens not just in US, but also incidents abroad, who’ve been kept silent with hush-money payments & NDA’s. MJ was a wolf in sheep’s clothing, pulled the wool over everyone's eyes, groomed the world, fooled us all & got away with it - all in plain sight!!! He played us all!!!
Ignore him.
Funny how “Ignore him” is what sheep tell each other to do
What sheep do is blindly believe mainstream media. Like you getting a PCR test and even the jab, because you were told to.
You should know.....
If you’d skipped over that period of life called childhood as Michael clearly did, you’d likely be hanging out with kids too….. He loved the purity, simplicity, and joy of children as many of us who worked with children do also. And they adored the absolute genius that he was… maybe have a few of your own so you’ll understand the attraction…And get your information straight.. you listen to mainstream media too much maybe. His mistake was that he had a medical doctor “caring” for him.
I find it really sad that some people WANT to believe that MJ was guilty. It is as though they WANT children to have been abused. A bit of a twisted stance in my view. There is SO MUCH evidence to the contrary, that those who choose to ignore it, are beyond indolent.
For starters, you could read this article by Mary A Fischer: https://mjjtruthnow.wordpress.com/2014/05/20/was-michael-jackson-framed-the-defining-1994-gq-article-by-mary-a-fischer-that-set-the-record-straight-on-the-1993-allegations/
Consider the Cascio family: they benefitted financially from their friendship with MJ while he was alive and they have upped the ante since his death. In 2011, Frank Cascio wrote a book: My Friend Michael: An Ordinary Friendship with an Extraordinary Man. He made a fortune. The family then sold MJ's soiled underwear. Eddie Cascio and his songwriting partner, James Porte, faked songs using an MJ impersonator called Jason Malachi. These songs, which came to be known as the 'Cascio tracks', appreared on the posthumous album 'Michael'. It was only due to forensic research by MJ fans and REAL journalists, that this audacious fraud was exposed. The tracks were eventually removed from streaming platforms and subsequent versions of the album. See this brilliant podcast series for a breakdown of this shameful grift: https://www.fakingmichael.com/
It seems the Cascios have now run out of money, so they are attempting to extort the MJ Estate AGAIN by claiming that they were all abused. Are they really credible? Their accusations are risible and do not hold up to scrutiny. REAL victms are actually put at a disavantage when fake accusers make false claims.
Charles Thomson, an award-winning REAL journaiist, (who actually exposed a UK paedophile ring in Shoebury, Essex) wrote this article highlighting the disgraceful behaviour of the MSM during the MJ trial: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/one-of-the-most-shameful_b_610258
I don't expect you to read or listen to any of the above. But if you decide to ignore it, are you really in a position to pass judgement?
Are you implying MJs testimony, the videos of the ranch, the layout, and explanation he personally made were pretend, or AI, or forced somehow? Is that your theory?
And this new idea you’re dropping that anyone who is worried about pedophilia is secretly wanting abuse while the people who claim it never happens are secretly child rescuers? Do you read your own thoughts?
You seem to think if there’s bogus claims anywhere he must be innocent. But this is the same defense Trump and Epstein deploy. And now you.
MJ was a victim who treated children like they were equals. I get you don’t understand that’s pedophilia. I get you think mimicking consent for a child is okay on your book as long as you are Michael Jackson.
I get you guys are as lost as they come because the world wasn’t able to give you discernment yet. All you can do is blame someone like me who was interested in the case long before the post Covid recycled truth stories runs its retakes.
Your comment leans heavily on emotional framing and assumption rather than actual facts.
MJ's testimony supports innocence, not guilt. The ranch was an open, communal space visited by hundreds of families, celebrities, and children with their parents present.
'Mimicking consent with a child is okay as long as you're Michael Jackson'
This is a straw man. Our argument is that there's no evidence he did anything sexual with children. You're making the claim and you're providing flimsy evidence.
Robson told police nothing happened when he was 10 (1993), then testified again as an adult during the 2005 trial that MJ never behaved inappropriately. Only when MJ could no longer defend himself, after his death, did the story change; he filed a civil case, wanting millions. You're defending fraudulent behaviour.
Plus, Safechuck himself had testified as a character witness defending MJ. He didn't claim abuse until 2014 (after MJ's death, when he couldn't defend himself) — 25 years after the alleged events.
Jordan Chandler initially denied anything happened — until after his father administered sodium amytal (a sedative associated with false memory syndrome) during a dental procedure he oversaw. So, his father drugged him so that he could change his story. The investigation found no evidence against MJ. In 2006, Jordan took out a restraining order against his own father. 🤣
James, why are you on the wrong side of history?
There are no sides to history. Only ignorant people desperate for attention claiming there were. You have a binary idea that a victim cant be a perp or a perp cant be a victim too. This is the last time i will represent you with my case. You have yet to address any of these things and i can see why you are so desperate to disparage m so I give you the last word.
Deep breath Jerm. You can read these points and process them if you relax:
1) Are you implying MJs testimony, the videos of the ranch, the layout, and explanation he personally made were pretend, or AI, or forced somehow? Is that your theory?
2) This new idea you’re dropping that anyone who is worried about pedophilia is secretly wanting abuse while the people who claim it never happens are secretly child rescuers? Do you read your own thoughts?
3) You seem to think if there’s bogus claims anywhere he must be innocent. But this is the same defense Trump and Epstein deploy. And now you.
4) MJ was a victim who treated children like they were equals. I get you don’t understand that’s pedophilia. I get you think mimicking consent for a child is okay on your book as long as you are Michael Jackson.
'There are no sides to history. Only ignorant people desperate for attention claiming there were. '
Of course there are sides to history. For example, the true side and the fabricated side.
'You have a binary idea that a victim cant be a perp or a perp cant be a victim too.'
False. I have the binary idea that your claims are bunk. For your claims to be true, you need evidence. You have failed to provide such evidence.
Your questions are disingenuous and set up as logical fallacies to lean into your narrative. Plus, I've already answered them and will copy and paste my answers:
---
Your comment leans heavily on emotional framing and assumption rather than actual facts.
MJ's testimony supports innocence, not guilt. The ranch was an open, communal space visited by hundreds of families, celebrities, and children with their parents present.
'Mimicking consent with a child is okay as long as you're Michael Jackson'
This is a straw man. Our argument is that there's no evidence he did anything sexual with children. You're making the claim and you're providing flimsy evidence.
Robson told police nothing happened when he was 10 (1993), then testified again as an adult during the 2005 trial that MJ never behaved inappropriately. Only when MJ could no longer defend himself, after his death, did the story change; he filed a civil case, wanting millions. You're defending fraudulent behaviour.
Plus, Safechuck himself had testified as a character witness defending MJ. He didn't claim abuse until 2014 (after MJ's death, when he couldn't defend himself) — 25 years after the alleged events.
Jordan Chandler initially denied anything happened — until after his father administered sodium amytal (a sedative associated with false memory syndrome) during a dental procedure he oversaw. So, his father drugged him so that he could change his story. The investigation found no evidence against MJ. In 2006, Jordan took out a restraining order against his own father.
---
If you persist with your flimsy arguments lacking in evidence, then I would prefer you honour your threat of this being 'the last time i will represent you with my case.' Because you're wasting my time.
If you have an actual argument with actual evidence, then bring it. Otherwise, I'm not interested in your shallow nonsense.
I am sorry you have resorted to ad hominem attack. You will note that I did not address you personally. Also, straw man arguments won't wash either. I have provided you with links. If you have discernment yourself, you will spend the next couple of days listening and reading. Finding the truth takes commitment. If you choose not to do this, I cannot help you.
You have demonstrated an ability to comprehend no more than a single sentence from a reply.
I repeat: your modus operandi is to resort to ad hominem attack. I have better things to do than respond to insults.
Then why are you responding?
The saying is that we recognize qualities of others that are in ourselves. If you see evil, you have the same evil tendancy. Some of us choose to see the beauty and innocence. Who’s sick now?
Who said that? Can you name them? I ask because my guess is they have lived a horrible life believing boundaries and discernment makes them evil.
Did you actually listen to the interview? It would seem that you didn’t.
As for your opening shot - victims DO NOT always become perpetrators. I was the victim of a violent mother. Do you want to know how often I have ever hit a child? ZERO TIMES MATE.
Swan off to your own indecipherable channel. James. You are not a rational judge.
Many thanks for this fascinating interview. I was never convinced that Michael Jackson was a bad person.
MJandboys.wordpress.com
So many wild claims and no evidence.
Open Your Eyes!!!!!
*Search:- 'MJ and boys'
*Listen:- 'Be Careful Who You Love' -Dimond
*Search:- 'Norma Staikos'
I have looked at these articles in the past. Who authored them? I cannot see a name. Whoever it is, they have gone to a great deal of trouble. Why? They allude to the ‘victims’ who have been discredited.
“Wade says that he was molested by Michael from age 7 until age 14 (1990-1997). We were able to prove that Wade has spent 176 nights with Jackson. No one knows what Michael did to young Wade during those nights.”
The idea that MJ was some Machiavellian mastermind who manipulated everyone in his orbit, is ridiculous. Listen to Wade’s mother destroy Wade’s timeline: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnjtrYjMbc8
Search:- 'MJ and boys'
Listen:- 'Be Careful Who You Love' -Dimond
Search:- 'Norma Staikos'
All propaganda.
Funny how MJ obsessed stans fans can't face the truth about MJ the man & pretend to play deaf, dumb & blind when the information is staring them in the face!!!
It's about evidence. There is no evidence he did anything wrong. There is plenty of evidence he was targeted.
Did Mike fake his death like Bowie to boost album sales? Larping as Dave Dave?
It’s a question worth asking.
In case anyone doesn't know about Bowie: on YT "Jack Steven on David Bowie"
“to boost album sales”? You’re joking of course
You think an artist dying suddenly doesn't boost album sales?
I still beg to differ regarding the Santa Marta (favela) version of TDCAU! It is not merely a 'happy clappy' version, as I explained in my UKC posts. But we will have to agree to disagree. It certainly isn't a frivolous subject, and all roads do indeed lead to Jeffery Epstein.
Spike is a great director, though!
I really like Michael Jackson, so I do some analysis on his music I really like Michael Jackson too I do some analysis on his music could you mention me so that I can gain a little bit in visibility ? It will help me a lot. Thanks in advance
MJ was a wolf in sheep's clothing, who pulled the wool over everyone's eyes, fooled the world & got away with it, all in plain sight! It's a valuable lesson to parents with young children - to beware of charming, creepy older men! We liked his music - but should never have let him 'babysit' our children!!!
Search:- 'MJ and boys'
Listen:- 'Be Careful Who You Love' - Dimond
Search:- 'Norma Staikos'
Why do people keep parroting the same nonsense? It's like you're a bot. Without fail, the same 'search MJ and boys' comment comes up, as if it's a gotcha. It isn't. Anything with Bashir is propaganda. He was a proven liar.
There is no evidence that MJ fiddled with kids. Even the kids said he didn't. And besides, if he was so dodgy, why did parents take their kids to Neverland for more than a decade? And why did the kid, who made the allegations, refuse to testify against MJ, and why did the same kid get a restraining order against his own father?
The trolls are restless. 🤣
Read / Listen to the Substack article:-
'The King of Pop and the Boys Around Him'
(Tracie Morrissey)
You’re parroting propaganda and it reveals more about what’s in your own heart, than that of Michael. He was a musical genius and a dancer extraordinaire. Perhaps it’s jealousy that is fueling this vicious attack on his legacy. His mistake was having anything to do with medical doctors and their poisonous “solutions”.
Read / Listen to the Substack article:-
'The King of Pop and the Boys Around Him'
(Tracie Morrissey)
i am always willing to change my mind about mj.
Read / Listen to the Substack article:-
'The King of Pop and the Boys Around Him'
(Tracie Morrissey)
Are you replying to every comment with the same reply?