You expect me to take Whitney Webb serious, when she can’t even get 9/11 right?
She’s sucking on Richard Gage’s teat, believing the thermite psyop of what happened on 9/11.
Until she gets 9/11 right, I don’t pay her much attention.
9/11 is the litmus test for any truther talking head and if they falter there, I take what they say with a pinch of salt.
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion". – Prof David A, Hughes
there are three key layers to perception management:
(i) the official narrative,
(ii) the official approved alternative narrative, and
(iii) the truth.
Most people, it seems, fall into Camp 1, blindly believing whatever the government and the mainstream media tell them, unable to think for themselves.
For those who make it out of Camp 1 into Camp 2, a decoy narrative awaits, promoted by organised fake dissidents.
Because it is a military operation, Camp 2 is vaster than most sceptics of Camp 1 would ever expect: its fake heroes, relentlessly promoted on “alternative” channels, are intended to hoover up opposition voices.
Very few people make it out of Camp 2 into Camp 3, where the truth awaits.
If more people woke up to the real truth of what happened on 9/11, then CV-19 most probably would have never happened.
The fact of the matter is, there is no speculation on “how it went down.”
Just an independent empirical investigation of the observable evidence that has you come to an irrefutable conclusion, and it points to black-ops technology that most people just can’t fathom, because it’s too sci-fi for them to wrap their heads around it.
That’s what the perps were counting on and the 9/11 “truther” movement was installed in 2005 to have people NOT wake up to the fact.
It’s nicely chronicled in these two books – 9/11 Finding the truth and 9/11 Holding the truth.
You might also want to read the 2007 qui-tam whistle-blower case files presenting the evidence collected. It was also nicely put together in this 500-page textbook, that should be mandatory reading for everyone on earth.
A 500-page textbook, that the 9/11 “truther” movement DOES NOT want you to know about or read, because once you’ve read it and understand the evidence, their grift is up.
The scariest 9/11 book out there: “Where did the towers go?” by Dr Judy Wood.
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up.
There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
It’s kinda funny though that plenty of people who make it out of both camps one and two — or who were never inhabitants of either camp to begin with — cannot agree with one another about what “the truth” is.
There’s not only a political / secular — “The Art of War” — application. Divide and conquer works remarkably well on the cultural and spiritual levels too. I’m wary of pretty much everyone who claims that they have or know “the truth” about any natural or anthropogenic phenomenon. I give more credence to truth seekers who are humble enough to stay inquiring, skeptical and intellectually curious. I don’t like unquestioning belief. Neither do I like unquestioning rejection. Plenty of times there’s (1) just not enough evidence or (2) just not enough divine revelation via faith, viz the faith which comes from having ears to hear the words of truth directly from the throne of GOD — in which Jesus Christ also sits — via the Holy Ghost aka the Spirit of the Lord (YHWH) aka the Spirit of the Most High God (Hebrew ´el `elyôn) aka the Spirit of Christ aka the Spirit of Truth.
I guess that I’m not a huge believer in secular, worldly, political, historical, scientific “truth”. Facts, maybe. Truths? Color me 🤨 dubious.
For example: is it a truth or a fact that (what medical science and experts and professionals call) “viruses” physically exist? That they are natural phenomena? I don’t want to make the physical existence of viruses some sort of litmus test — such as black operations controlling cold direct energy weapons dustified the World Trade Center in NYC on 9/11 is another example of a litmus test. I just want to point out that there are not a lot of facts which pass the truth test.
What we witnessed on 9/11 was technology that can free us of scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Cold fusion, one of the most important scientific discoveries in history, burst onto the world scene in 1989. This much maligned yet now confirmed discovery may radically change the energy structure of civilization.
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion". - Prof David A, Hughes
Yes, but it's unrelated to what Whitney wrote on Trump's carbon policy. It's like derailing an entire conversation on health because the guest said something about viruses.
I’m under the (mistaken?) impression that there are multiple arguments given by those in camp 3 who are all convinced that they have “the truth”.
I reject official narratives and (so-called) “truthers”, while acknowledging that camp 3 is neither unified nor organized by one single truth.
This is also true for the (so-called) “medical freedom movement” being (1) opposed to the official narrative that the anti-Covid injections (falsely called “vaccines”) are safe and effective (2) for their own false versions of what’s healthy.
You got it! Most people are not ready to be unplugged from the system! Every one of "The Matrix" movies ought to be required watching for every human being on this planet! These movies should be required watching for children in school! But not young children because young children wouldn't understand the meaning! Infact these movies might scare young children but when children get in junior high school at 12-13 years old then have them watch these movies as children this age should be able to understand the meaning when they're taught!
That's quite a decent wishlist Jerm. Reminds me of what a good man in the 1930's tried to do for Germany. Humanity would have thrived. It still can, we just have a long trek ahead.
Have you heard the claim that Trump hasn’t signed the paperwork to release funding and access to start making his transition team and is funding it himself? It implies that he is not willing to agree to all the stipulations on the paperwork and isn’t willing to play along with the “normal” way of doing things. I don’t know if this is true or how it really works, so if someone has more info to share, I’d love to hear it!
“… Trump will neither save America nor vastly improve on his first term.” FWIW, I wholeheartedly agree. He’s maintaining a cult of personality, fooling some of the people all of the time.
Jerm, I just heard that you recorded a 2 hr interview with JJ Couey...WHEN will it be up? It's important info and we need to have it up asap.... please, upload it quick!!!
Have you heard of Ole Dammegard? He is a famous Swedish investigator living in Spain. I have watched him in awe for 40 years and I think you might enjoy interviewing him. Here is a recent interview with him about his views on Trump: https://lightonconspiracies.com/trump-transformed-to-the-king-of-kings/
You expect me to take Whitney Webb serious, when she can’t even get 9/11 right?
She’s sucking on Richard Gage’s teat, believing the thermite psyop of what happened on 9/11.
Until she gets 9/11 right, I don’t pay her much attention.
9/11 is the litmus test for any truther talking head and if they falter there, I take what they say with a pinch of salt.
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion". – Prof David A, Hughes
Article: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood
there are three key layers to perception management:
(i) the official narrative,
(ii) the official approved alternative narrative, and
(iii) the truth.
Most people, it seems, fall into Camp 1, blindly believing whatever the government and the mainstream media tell them, unable to think for themselves.
For those who make it out of Camp 1 into Camp 2, a decoy narrative awaits, promoted by organised fake dissidents.
Because it is a military operation, Camp 2 is vaster than most sceptics of Camp 1 would ever expect: its fake heroes, relentlessly promoted on “alternative” channels, are intended to hoover up opposition voices.
Very few people make it out of Camp 2 into Camp 3, where the truth awaits.
Are you perfect? Do you get everything right? Should I also not listen to anything you say until I'm in agreement with 100% of everything you say? 😎
Whitney's article on Trump is excellent and worth reading. (It has nothing to do with 9/11.)
Don't worry - I read it. It's good. :-)
As I stated - 9/11 is the litmus test for any "truther" talking head and if they falter there, I take what they say with a pinch of salt.
Do you have a monopoly on truth? Sounds like it. :-)
No, man. Not at all...
If more people woke up to the real truth of what happened on 9/11, then CV-19 most probably would have never happened.
The fact of the matter is, there is no speculation on “how it went down.”
Just an independent empirical investigation of the observable evidence that has you come to an irrefutable conclusion, and it points to black-ops technology that most people just can’t fathom, because it’s too sci-fi for them to wrap their heads around it.
That’s what the perps were counting on and the 9/11 “truther” movement was installed in 2005 to have people NOT wake up to the fact.
It’s nicely chronicled in these two books – 9/11 Finding the truth and 9/11 Holding the truth.
You might also want to read the 2007 qui-tam whistle-blower case files presenting the evidence collected. It was also nicely put together in this 500-page textbook, that should be mandatory reading for everyone on earth.
A 500-page textbook, that the 9/11 “truther” movement DOES NOT want you to know about or read, because once you’ve read it and understand the evidence, their grift is up.
The scariest 9/11 book out there: “Where did the towers go?” by Dr Judy Wood.
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up.
There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com
Andrew Johnson's two FREE E-Books on 9/11:
1. 9/11 – Finding the Truth - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/pdf/9-11%20-%20Finding%20the%20Truth.pdf
2. 9/11 – Holding the Truth - http://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/911%20Holding%20The%20Truth%20-Andrew%20Johnson%20-%202017.pdf
Jerm 1 Revisionist 0
It’s kinda funny though that plenty of people who make it out of both camps one and two — or who were never inhabitants of either camp to begin with — cannot agree with one another about what “the truth” is.
Which in itself becomes a distraction and feeds into the official psyop. The Art Of War is about dividing the opposition. Works like a charm!
There’s not only a political / secular — “The Art of War” — application. Divide and conquer works remarkably well on the cultural and spiritual levels too. I’m wary of pretty much everyone who claims that they have or know “the truth” about any natural or anthropogenic phenomenon. I give more credence to truth seekers who are humble enough to stay inquiring, skeptical and intellectually curious. I don’t like unquestioning belief. Neither do I like unquestioning rejection. Plenty of times there’s (1) just not enough evidence or (2) just not enough divine revelation via faith, viz the faith which comes from having ears to hear the words of truth directly from the throne of GOD — in which Jesus Christ also sits — via the Holy Ghost aka the Spirit of the Lord (YHWH) aka the Spirit of the Most High God (Hebrew ´el `elyôn) aka the Spirit of Christ aka the Spirit of Truth.
I guess that I’m not a huge believer in secular, worldly, political, historical, scientific “truth”. Facts, maybe. Truths? Color me 🤨 dubious.
For example: is it a truth or a fact that (what medical science and experts and professionals call) “viruses” physically exist? That they are natural phenomena? I don’t want to make the physical existence of viruses some sort of litmus test — such as black operations controlling cold direct energy weapons dustified the World Trade Center in NYC on 9/11 is another example of a litmus test. I just want to point out that there are not a lot of facts which pass the truth test.
Your thoughts?
When it comes to 9/11 and you understand ALL the evidence, then you'd find the argument given in camp 3, is irrefutable.
Issue with 9/11 is that an industry has been built to keep you OUT OF camp 3.
It started with the formation of the 9/11 truth movement, way back in 2005.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Understanding the 9/11 EVIDENCE
Video thought experiment: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
Sure, but none of this has anything to do with Trump's carbon policies.
What we witnessed on 9/11 was technology that can free us of scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Cold fusion, one of the most important scientific discoveries in history, burst onto the world scene in 1989. This much maligned yet now confirmed discovery may radically change the energy structure of civilization.
Cold Fusion: Fire from Water
Video: https://rumble.com/v5lnot6-cold-fusion-fire-from-water-1998.html
"Cold Fusion", Steven E. Jones, Thermite & 9/11
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion". - Prof David A, Hughes
Video: https://rumble.com/v5lto5w-cold-fusion-steven-e.-jones-thermite-and-911.html
Yes, but it's unrelated to what Whitney wrote on Trump's carbon policy. It's like derailing an entire conversation on health because the guest said something about viruses.
I’m under the (mistaken?) impression that there are multiple arguments given by those in camp 3 who are all convinced that they have “the truth”.
I reject official narratives and (so-called) “truthers”, while acknowledging that camp 3 is neither unified nor organized by one single truth.
This is also true for the (so-called) “medical freedom movement” being (1) opposed to the official narrative that the anti-Covid injections (falsely called “vaccines”) are safe and effective (2) for their own false versions of what’s healthy.
This is SO relevant for today.... wow......
The System is Our Enemy
Most people are not ready to be unplugged and so hopelessly dependent on the system that they will fight to protect it. https://metatron.substack.com/p/the-system-is-our-enemy
You got it! Most people are not ready to be unplugged from the system! Every one of "The Matrix" movies ought to be required watching for every human being on this planet! These movies should be required watching for children in school! But not young children because young children wouldn't understand the meaning! Infact these movies might scare young children but when children get in junior high school at 12-13 years old then have them watch these movies as children this age should be able to understand the meaning when they're taught!
That's quite a decent wishlist Jerm. Reminds me of what a good man in the 1930's tried to do for Germany. Humanity would have thrived. It still can, we just have a long trek ahead.
Have you heard the claim that Trump hasn’t signed the paperwork to release funding and access to start making his transition team and is funding it himself? It implies that he is not willing to agree to all the stipulations on the paperwork and isn’t willing to play along with the “normal” way of doing things. I don’t know if this is true or how it really works, so if someone has more info to share, I’d love to hear it!
Yeah I would love to hear this too! It may help us figure out what Trump really is about!
Only way to figure out what Trump’s really about is to observe his behavior. Not that easy.
Yeah that's true! My gut tells me not to trust Trump! I tried but I think Trump is just telling Americans what they want to hear!
My gut tells me don’t trust any politicians words.
🎯 Exactly!
You wrote: "And yes, I am not a believer in democracy because it is mob rule based on the political party with the best billboards."
Well, whaddaya know, I'm not alone ....
“… Trump will neither save America nor vastly improve on his first term.” FWIW, I wholeheartedly agree. He’s maintaining a cult of personality, fooling some of the people all of the time.
Jerm, I just heard that you recorded a 2 hr interview with JJ Couey...WHEN will it be up? It's important info and we need to have it up asap.... please, upload it quick!!!
Hi Jerm!
Have you heard of Ole Dammegard? He is a famous Swedish investigator living in Spain. I have watched him in awe for 40 years and I think you might enjoy interviewing him. Here is a recent interview with him about his views on Trump: https://lightonconspiracies.com/trump-transformed-to-the-king-of-kings/
He is scheduled to come on in a few weeks. :-)
Ooh amazing! That is excellent! xx
You're a member. Don't you get my emails? :-)
I get more than 500 emails a day! I am inundated! There aren't enough hours in a day for me to actually attend to all of them - drives me nuts tbh!